The World’s Leading Microsoft .NET Magazine
   
 
realworldsa


Search this Blog

 








iPing-it!

---------------

---------------

WSE 3.0 cannot be used with the Compact Framework 2.0 on Mobile 5.0 devices

posted Saturday, 11 February 2006
 

With all of the PPC and Smart Phone development going on I find it insane that the Compact Framework doesn't take advantage of WSE 3.0.

There are a few options available to us, like http://opennetcf.org/ which just released beta1 of their library Smart Device Framework (SDF) 2.0.  But why isn't Microsoft providing us with the tools we need to use their tools?

I posted to two Microsoft forums ( Here and Here) for feedback, but I just got pointed to OpenNETCF.  If Microsoft is going to make use depend on third parties for secure communication when using web services on smart devices, they should start getting involved with those third parties and put together some samples on how to use them correctly.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Nazim left...
Sunday, 12 February 2006 2:06 pm :: http://blogs.msdn.com/nazimms

The CF team works very closely with OpenNETCF. All the major code owners on OpenNETCF are NETCF MVPs.

As far as documenting the use of SDF goes ... I believe that is OpenNETCF's responsibility and I know for a fact that their forums are really good for getting answers.

As far as why NETCF doesn't support WSE goes ... MS technology in general seems to be moving away from WSE and towards Indigo ... and NETCF will be doing the same. Check out MikeZin's blog at http://blogs.msdn.com/mikezintel/archive/2005/02/03/366662.aspx for more info.


2. Tad Anderson left...
Sunday, 12 February 2006 5:14 pm :: http://realworldsa.dotnetdevelopersjourn

Thanks for the info. We had one team going down the Vista route, but they were stopped short when they were told by MS that they had no idea how long it would be before CF and or Mobile would be ready for WCF.

I thought I read somewhere WSE would be part of WCF, so unless I read wrong, it would make sense to support the WS-* protocols with WSE now, and lead us through a migration path later, to what may not be that different.

So it looks like for now we are in a dead zone, no WSE and no WCF. With the release of VSTS 2005 and Mobile 5.0 and CF 2.0 just happening, why is MS moving so rapidly towards the next release of stuff?

Looks like we are left with home brewing, or using someone else’s home brewed solution.


3. Nazim left...
Sunday, 12 February 2006 9:02 pm :: http://blogs.msdn.com/nazimms

The have "channels" in Indigo that encapsulate the WS* protocols, so no worries on that front. Officially, MS will support WSE also moving forward, but I am assuming there won't be much innovation in that space. MS will promote the use of Indigo in its stead ... and I *do* think Indigo is the way to go if you are going to be writing apps on the desktop that avail of the WS* protocols.

You are right in the fact that it is not sure when CF will release with support for WCF ... but you can keep track of MikeZin's blog and he might leak out some info on that ground ;)


4. Tad Anderson left...
Monday, 13 February 2006 1:35 am :: http://realworldsa.dotnetdevelopersjourn

Geez, what a bad place to be. Now I recall why it is called Bleeding-edge technology... we are certainly bleeding...

It would seem we need to wait until OpenNETCF gets done building and documenting the OpenNETCF Smart Device Framework 2.0 before we have a completed managed compact framework 2.0 for Mobile 5.0 devices.

More on CF 2.0 Lacking... http://realworldsa.dotnetdev elopersjournal.com/net_compact_framework_20_guidance_and_documentation_is_p itif.htm


5. Nazim left...
Monday, 13 February 2006 2:00 pm :: http://blogs.msdn.com/nazimms

This is great feedback ... if you have more complaints forward them to me. I would like to compile these and address them seriously for upcoming releases.

Thanks for the info.


6. Tad Anderson left...
Monday, 13 February 2006 5:12 pm :: http://realworldsa.dotnetdevelopersjourn

I have reponded to what I am looking for here:

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/showpost.aspx?postid=248030&siteid=1< /a>


7. Mike Zintel left...
Tuesday, 14 February 2006 8:07 pm

We're working on the right level of WS-* support. Sadly, it didn't get done for V2.


8. ctacke left...
Saturday, 25 February 2006 7:23 pm

We did a fair amount of work for SDF 2.0 in the WSE area, but that was almost exclusively due to changes in what CF 2.0 provides. WSE in SDF 1.x wasn't an exact duplicate of the FFX, and we used all internal encryption stuff. CF 2.0 added a lot of encryption support, so where applicable we ripped ours out and used theirs, assuming that theirs is likely tested better than ours.

Beyond that, I don't suspect we'll be doing much for documentation. We rely heavily on Casey's originals and the samples available for the desktop. Of course we could always be monetarily persuaded to work on docs, but if you're just waiting for it, you might be in for a long wait.